For as long as I can remember, I have been
deeply moved by the report that, when Jesus went to the garden, he took Peter,
James and John apart with him and asked them to watch and pray. He obviously wanted understanding friends to be
with him as he brought his anguish to God, but they fell asleep. In the
meantime, he underwent an agony so violent that blood burst through his
veins. In that agony, he asked that
"this chalice might pass from him,” but echoed the words of his Mother in
the story of the Annunciation: "Not
my will, but thine be done." Then, when he returned to his sleeping
friends, he asked, plaintively, "Could you not watch an hour with
me?"
In my youth and in my early years as a priest.
I went to Jesus when I was achingly lonely, anguishing over wounds, in need of
comforting, pleading for help in remaining involved with individuals I would
gladly exclude from my life, and hoping to yield to God’s will as he did. Recalling his agony in the garden, I knew
that he would understand.
As I probed the implications of an
incarnational theology, I began to see the events remembered on Holy Thursday
and Good Friday as a single process. Thus, Jesus’ command to reenact the Last
Supper instituted a ritual designed to assure us of his continuing presence
with us, despite the cruel crucifixion.
In each reenactment, he reaffirms the Covenant sealed at his birth, when
he became fully human in order to share intimately in the lives of all human
beings.
In the garden, he glimpsed the existential
implications of the promise encoded in the Eucharist. In sum, his promise to entrust himself to
anyone who receives Communion committed him to intimate involvement in the pain
as well as the joy they experience. And if he loved with an ever faithful love,
he would have to be willing to seek even those who inflicted horrendous pain on
other individuals.
When I began to see the Agony as a willingness
to empathize with the pain of every human being throughout the ages, I was more
awed by the Yes in the Garden than by Jesus’ submission to a cruel scourging, a
crown of thorns, and a humiliating and painful death on the cross. But I also became convinced that regarding
the Agony in the Garden and the Crucifixion as discrete events distorted the
meaning of both.
Perhaps the most staggering insight came on
the feast of St. Francis. I had long been awed by Francis’ intimate involvement
with Jesus, but I had also been uncomfortable with his apparent desire to
suffer as Jesus did. Frankly, I tended
to dismiss it as a motivation inspired by an ascetical theory that I could
easily reject. (In that vein, I could
never understand how he could treat everything in nature with profound respect
except his body.)
On
this feast day, I realized that, in his intimate involvement with Jesus,
Francis longed to comfort Jesus in his Agony.
As a child of his age, he lived out that involvement in part by
inflicting pain on himself through fasting.
The point of this reflection: I had often imagined Jesus undergoing the
agony in the garden to aid me in bringing my anguished struggles to him, the
wounded Healer. Until that day, I had
never recreated the scene in my imagination with the intent of watching with
him, as one of his disciples. I could
tell myself that I went through his agony with him when I did so with wounded
individuals who came to me. After all,
he assures me that whatever do to them, I do to him. Now, though, I want to converse directly with
him, as I would with them, to hear his cry for human companionship in the agony
he continues to experience because of his intimate involvement with all who
suffer.
(Addendum:
The pain Jesus experienced was the price of being human and loving with
an ever faithful love, not a price paid to divine justice in reparation for
human sinfulness.)
No comments:
Post a Comment