Over the course of centuries, Hosea's
metaphor, which compared God's loving involvement with Israel to a
marriage-union, yielded a language which describes love as a passionate,
vulnerable, respectful and faithful involvement. The application of the metaphor of intimacy
which it encodes to life within the Trinity implies that the three divine Persons
are so intimately involved that there is only one divine life. But it also raises an intriguing
question: How were each of the three
divine Persons involved in the decision to create the universe?
As the previous Reflection indicated, the
meta-narrative which has dominated the Christian tradition since the Protestant
Revolution traces the Incarnation to a just judgment that a sin of Adam
severed, irreparably, a natural relationship between Creator and
creatures. From that starting point, it
asserted that divine mercy sought a way to repair the relationship. In the resulting dance, divine justice had to
decree that only a cruel and humiliating death of the Son could make the sort
of reparation required to restore the relationship. But divine mercy countered by urging the
eternal Word to embrace that judgment.
In this meta-narrative, neither justice nor
mercy are personified. In some ways,
they rule life within the Trinity impersonally.
In marked contrast, an Incarnational theology traces the act of creation
to an out-pouring (over-flow) of the intimate love of three Divine
Persons. Implicitly, it asks the
question formulated above: What was the
role of each of the three divine Persons in the decision to create?
On this feast of the Annunciation, I was
struck by a vision of the dialogue within the Trinity that led to the birth of
the eternal Word as a baby at Christmas.
In my experience, it is the indwelling Spirit who urges me to
spontaneous actions which often involve me in intensely personal ways with
persons I would rather have excluded from my life. From this perspective, the Spirit moved the
Father and the Word to share the divine life outside the Trinity in a creation
consisting of finite entities. And this
urging required that the Word become incarnate, since words are meaningful only
when they draw lines, posit distinctions of generated distinctive forms of
life.
In response to the urgings of the Spirit,
the eternal Word embraced the Spirit's longing to share with finite human
beings the intimate love shared by the three divine Persons. In this admittedly whimsically account of the
dialogue that led to the Incarnation, the Father had to go along with the
project of the indwelling Spirit.
That project can be succinctly
defined: At birth, human beings are plunged
into a journey into the unknown. Since
they must use an everyday language acquired through socialization to process
their experience, they cannot escape from the definition of what it is to be
fully human and to live with integrity transmitted by the formative power of
that language. But those who commit
themselves to a shared journey with Jesus, the way, the truth and the life,
soon recognize the flawed existence fostered by any language at hand. And they become aware that, if they want to
enter into a journey to deepening intimacy with Jesus, they must allow the
movements of the indwelling Spirit in their tangled depths to inform their
involvements with one another, as Jesus, fully human as well as fully God, did.
In this context, I have been endlessly
intrigued by Harold Bloom's suggestion that the stories compiled in the Jewish
Scriptures depict not only a God of new beginnings, but also a God whose search
for unique individuals willing to embrace life fully was constantly
disappointed. This reading effectively
exposes the ways that TV evangelists assure those who support them financially
that they are protecting a version of the covenant which includes them among
the elect. But their understanding of
the life of the elect makes no contact with the prophetic call to embrace the
quest for a fully human and uniquely personal existence. And as an honest searcher, I could not
survive in a small world governed by these evangelists.
No comments:
Post a Comment