I have noted elsewhere that being a priest
is like being a parent. Parents know
that they are parents. I can only hope
that they do not suppose that they know how to parent each of their unique
offspring through the course of their own journeys into the unknown. In that vein, I could never doubt that I was
a priest, but I had to learn the hard way that I would never know what my next
involvement with a flawed individual like me would tap in me or what any
interaction would ask of me.
Now, when my lack of staying power limits
my active involvements, I understand more fully why, for the Eucharistic
celebration of the 25th anniversary of my ordination, I had to choose the
Scriptural passage in which Jeremiah complained that God had duped him. To dramatize the insight, I note that, when I
am asked to witness an exchange of marriage vows, I insist on choosing the
Gospel passage to be read. That passage
concludes with the words: "This is
my commandment: Love one another as I have
loved you." This insistence allows
me to point out that this call is addressed to everyone, but we have neither
the opportunity nor the energy to be so involved with everyone who enters our
lives. By their vows, the couple say to
one another: "But with you, I vow
to be faithful to a shared journey informed by my passionate longing to be
involved with you in this way."
From this perspective, God duped me by
calling me to be involved in this way with everyone who entered my life, to the
best of my abilities, though our encounters would not call for a commitment to
remain passionately, vulnerably, respectfully and faithfully involved, for
better or worse, as long as we shall live.
To be so involved as a priest, therefore, I
had to accept the fact that I would be involved with individuals in intensely
personal ways, for a time. To let them
go on with lives apart from me and to make room for new encounters, I had to
learn how to grieve in a way that allowed me to be fully present, without
judgments or agendas, to the next wounded person who came to me in the hope
that Jesus, the wounded Healer, might come to them through me, as he had with
others who urged them to talk with me.
I realize now that my hope that Jesus might
come to wounded individuals though my involvement with them plunged me into a
perpetual interplay between a grieving process and an upsurge of joy and
gratitude that God had entrusted individuals whose vulnerability I shared to my
care.
But my awareness of what was happening came
by fits and starts. To describe the
process, I must begin with my gratitude to God for two women in my life who
have been passionately, vulnerably, respectfully and faithfully involved with
me for many, many years. My beloved niece,
Marie, is one of them. As one who wants
to process experience inwardly before expressing vulnerable self-revelations, I
would not have wanted to go through life without such an involvement with a
woman whose deep feelings lie close to the surface who loves me, warts and all,
and wants her husband and children to share their journey to deepening intimacy
with me. She is still a mystery to
me. Nonetheless, though our
conversations may be few and far between, we begin without judgments or
agendas.
On my journey through life, I have not had
anyone, man or women, with whom to return again and again to tangled
interactions in everyday life. Once I
realized how this absence called me to relive perpetually unfinished
interactions with individuals who entered and departed from my life in personal
conversations with Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit, however, I realized that
I would not have wanted to go through life without an intensely personal
involvement with each of them comparable to my involvement with Marie. And they are always there.
No comments:
Post a Comment